What’s the #1 Biggest Timewaster for Learning to Write Grants?

How to go straight to the winning column instead!

What is the #1 Time Waster for Learning to Write Grants?

What is the #1 Time Waster for Learning to Write Grants?

The first and second times I wrote a grant were hard (see my #1 best-selling on Amazon book Funded! Successful Grantwriting for Your Nonprofit for the full story).  Plus they were unsuccessful, so it wasted my time and the tie of the people who reviewed them.

It’s embarrassing to admit, but since I was a brand-new intern, as well as a neophyte grantwriter, it shouldn’t be too surprising. But those three words haunt me to this day, and led me to want to assist aspiring grantwriters in the future, if I ever got good at the task.

The three words I’m referring to are…

Trial and Error.

Some things are good for trial and error.  Learning to walk, for example.  Learning to write a bicycle, or skateboard.  It’s an ok approach with magic tricks (except the one with sawing the person in half—that’s not so good for trial and error!).

But grantwriting?

Not so much.

Writing grants is much more of a high wire, no-net sort of activity.  If the funds don’t come in, programs can be cut, jobs lost, and clients left without services.  So, if the bet you can do to learn is trial and error, you’re endangering a lot of important elements of a nonprofit.

Can you learn a lot by trial and error?  Of course!  But it is a slow and inefficient approach to learning.

What can you do instead?

I’ve got a solution to the problem of losing a lot of grant proposals by depending on trial and error.

It’s called the Funded! Successful Grantwriting for Your Nonprofit online grantwriting course.  It’s based on my #1 book of the same name, and is the exact same material that students in my graduate level grantwriting course get.

This is not some one or two day workshop—leaving you on your own to continue the time and money-wasting “trial and error” mistake.  This is the same as a three hour graduate course that leads you from never having written a grant to being able to submit it successfully.

Stop wasting time—get Funded! By checking out the material here.

Stop wasting time!  Go get Funded!

 

 

3 Inescapable Reasons You MUST Have an Outside Reviewer for Your Grant Proposals (DETAILED)

Wouldn't you trade $500 for $1,000,000?

Why you must have an outside reviewer for your grant proposals

Why you must have an outside reviewer for your grant proposals

Have you ever gotten a grant proposal rejected and found the reviewers’ comments “embarrassing” because they notice a REALLY OBVIOUS problem that took you out of contention nearly immediately?

Or, maybe you received a score on your Federal grant that put you “just a few points” out of the running for funding?

In both these situations, you would have benefited from having an outside reviewer give you feedback BEFORE you hit the “submit” button.

As a Federal grant reviewer, and as someone who reviews many draft grant proposals every year, I’ve found there many inescapable reasons that you should ALWAYS have an outside reviewer assess your proposals.  This is true whether you are a new grantwriter or have many years of experience.

Here are three.

  1. You know too much!

There’s a phenomenon called “the curse of the expert” that grantwriters fall prey to.  In this situation, you have lots of information in your head.  You’re the resident expert on the agency, its history, its strengths, its capacities—in short, you know everything there is to know about your agency, your community, and the needs of the community. That’s all good. But experts can assume that everyone else also knows that information. This leads to major problems in writing grants.

What isn’t good is when you “forget” that other people (such as the people who will review your proposal) don’t have all that knowledge.  They only know what they read in your proposal.  When you neglect to include crucial information in your grant, gaps exist that undermine your proposal.

An outside reviewer will notice these gaps and point out that vital data, history, or other elements are missing.

  1. The logic in your logic model isn’t as tight as you think it is.

Once you’ve been working on a grant proposal long enough to get to developing a logic model, you’ve put in a LOT of effort.  The odds are you firmly believe in the need to start a new program, and you have faith that your organization will be able to conduct the program that will solve the main issues at stake.  You confidently draw up the logic model and include it in your proposal.

More than likely, however, you’ve included linkages and connections in the logic model that aren’t really all that tight.  You may be assuming things such as cooperative agency partners, the ease of hiring new staff who can quickly implement a new evidence-based program, or even that learning new information will automatically result in changing behaviors by clients.

An outside reviewer will keep you honest and will subject your logic model to intense scrutiny, just like the proposal reviewers will.  It’s easy for wishful thinking to creep into logic models because we convince ourselves that we’re absolutely correct.  Plus, by the time you’ve worked on the proposal and logic model for a while, it’s tough to see it with fresh eyes.

  1. You don’t know everything.

I’m sure everyone knows, intellectually, that we don’t we don’t know everything, even though we may know a great deal about certain subjects.  Some topics are things that we haven’t learned about; some experiences are ones we have not had.  This leads to problems in grant proposals themselves, or even in the processes of writing grants.  Usually, what we don’t know hurts us and the grants we develop.

Outside reviewers are extremely helpful in providing new information and techniques.  They know things you don’t know and have done things you haven’t.  Everyone knows things that others don’t and outside grant reviewers may know LOTS that you don’t know.

Why might you NOT want to hire an outside reviewer?

Agencies resist hiring outside reviewers.

One reason is “they cost so much”.  Certainly, they should cost something.  To do a thorough review can take several hours or more, depending on the grant.  So, that’s a given. But what does “too much” really mean?  If you spend $500 and it results in making changes to the proposal that gets it funded for $1,500,000, is that “too much”?  Even if the grant only is awarded at the $100,000 level, is $500 really too much?

I think the cost argument is often a mask for being scared.  Most of us have an “imposter” feeling about the work we do, at least now and then.  Do you feel that an outside reviewer’s critique will cause people to doubt your abilities?  Will you suddenly be fired if the “truth” comes out?

I think the opposite is more likely to be true:  with the help of an outside reviewer, you are MORE LIKELY to get the proposal funded, and thus be seen as an important part of the team.  People who bring in funding tend to be praised, not criticized.

If anyone balks at bringing in an outside reviewer, it’s entirely appropriate to describe the three inescapable reasons you MUST hire an outside reviewer listed here.

You also might not hire an outside reviewer because you don’t know of anyone who does that sort of work.  If that’s the case, I’m happy to let you know that I provide that service.  Contact me at richard@richardhoefer.com and we’ll set up a time to talk. I have only limited openings, so it’s important to contact me as early in the proposal-writing process as possible.

Thanks for reading–what have your experiences been with outside reviewers?  Helpful?  Not helpful?  Be sure to comment below.

Thanks,

Dr. Richard Hoefer

Author, Funded!  Successful Grantwriting for Your Nonprofit

3 Inescapable Reasons You Must Have an Outside Reviewer for Your Grant Proposals

Why you must have an outside reviewer for your grant proposals

Why you must have an outside reviewer for your grant proposals

I’ve been working with a lot of aspiring grantwriters since August.  They have all turned in a draft Federal grant proposal which they thought were pretty good.

My job was to review each one, and as I did so, I noted a few common issues with the proposals–ones that grantwriters of ALL LEVELS make.

When we were all talking after they read the review, they were thankful, even the ones with LOTS of comments suggesting needed improvements.  As one person said–“How could I have missed that!”  Another said:  “It took a while, but now I realize we forgot that no one else knows our organization, so we need to write more about our skills and strengths.”  A third person mentioned “I didn’t know that!”

Contact me so that I can help you overcome these 3 inescapable reasons you MUST have an outside reviewer for your grant proposals. I hope I can assist you in getting FUNDED!

Dr. Richard Hoefer

Author of #1 bestseller on Amazon, Funded!  Successful Grantwriting for YOUR Nonprofit

4 Mistakes You May Be Making in Your Grants BEFORE You Write a Word

These are costing your organization!

4 Mistakes GWs Make Before Writing

Grantwriters can lose funding for scads of reasons–but here are 4 completely avoidable ones you may be making before you even begin to write a single word.

  • Assuming your organization can “handle” winning a grant
  • Searching for funding in an unsystematic way
  • Sending proposals to funders who aren’t likely to be interested in your ideas
  • Jumping into writing the proposal before repeatedly reading the entire RFP

Learn how to avoid these mistakes (and much more) by enrolling in the online grantwriting course based on the #1 bestselling book, Funded! Successful Grantwriting for Your Nonprofit.  Check out it by clicking here.